The irony of AI is that it is a wrecking ball to the orthodoxy of the existing corporate structure. Pre-AI, the person perceived to be the most intelligent ascended up the corporate ladder by being able to quickly and accurately perform the thinking processes AI can now automate almost instantly.
Now that AI can do most of that executive thinking in a near automated fashion, it means the executives whose jobs were to think and make sound decisions are now redundant.
That's why there's so much pushback in the corporate space against AI. CEOs, VPs, Directors, they all know they are easily replaceable by well trained AI agents.
The greater irony is that the what AI lacks is the unconscious intelligence of the human nervous system that processes information through presence, not language.
Ergo, the ones who will create AI agents that make everyone from the Director to the CEO redundant are the ones who aren't paid to think, but rather, paid to be present.
The irony of AI is that it is a wrecking ball to the orthodoxy of the existing corporate structure. Pre-AI, the person perceived to be the most intelligent ascended up the corporate ladder by being able to quickly and accurately perform the thinking processes AI can now automate almost instantly.
Now that AI can do most of that executive thinking in a near automated fashion, it means the executives whose jobs were to think and make sound decisions are now redundant.
That's why there's so much pushback in the corporate space against AI. CEOs, VPs, Directors, they all know they are easily replaceable by well trained AI agents.
The greater irony is that the what AI lacks is the unconscious intelligence of the human nervous system that processes information through presence, not language.
Ergo, the ones who will create AI agents that make everyone from the Director to the CEO redundant are the ones who aren't paid to think, but rather, paid to be present.
Those are the rank and file employees.