Being Direct Would Make The World A Better Place

I’ve noticed a trend among content being produced in the last 5 years, specifically around topics that are causing discontent.

The observation is that the statements being made by people are indirect, aloof, vague, open eneded - instead of being direct, to the point, absolute and assertive.

For example regarding immigration - you’ll see comments such as:

“Doctors and Engineers” in a tongue in cheek roundabout statement of the cultural enrichment. Or “Diversity is our Strength” - also mocking the narrative. Videos of England showing the current situation will show once white only areas full of foreigners, but not actually spelling out the perceived problem.

Everything is posed as a question instead of an answer. Round about. Vague.

Foreign immigration is one topic of sensitivity but there are multiple other concurrent hot spots causing public anger. Wars, opression, politicians with hundreds of millions of net worth, the ever increasing cost of living and so on…

There are clearly emergent signs of social unreset as a response to the direction forced upon them by politicians.

So why is everyone being so roundabout, so vague in respsone?

Either people haven’t figured out what the root cause of their problems are - or they are too afraid to criticize the root cause in public.

I don’t read the news, but sometimes it creeps into my feed.

Currently in England there is a huge awakening and action in the form of hanging St. George’s cross - the native England flag - from anything and everything.

People are angry, upset, but they seem to be unclear as to what they are angry and upset about?

They have taken to action but the action is - adding flags around the country.

St.George’s cross is distinct, parochial, specific to England. Not the Union Jack which is a combination of (England, Scotland, Ireland). Yes it implies uniqueness, but that isn’t going to solve problems. Action is good, but im not sure that adding flags is going to do anything.

The issue with being indirect when communicating is that the time taken for people to be vaguely aware of a symptom of a problem to root cause identification is greatly prolonged. “Normies” may not put two and two together for years, meaning that the society as a whole will react in fits and starts of uncoordinated effort. Ultimately culminating in a societial behavioral shift after a longer than necessary period of time.

Early advocates of change will stick out like a nail and be hammered down by the system. Eventually these nails will become an overwhelming in number and become unmanagable by the controlling establishment.

It is better to move in unison earlier on.

This means less vaguery, more opinion earlier on.

Language must be more direct, clear and self explanatory for those new to the topic. Answers must be stated not questions asked, in order to elevate the understanding of others as fast as possible.

I believe on all of these topics, there is a mix of lack of clarity and fear of speaking out.

Clearly control systems are in place to supress mainstream media and to inhibit freedom of speech through online platforms. Online platforms are the way we communicate as the times of people congregating and communicating face to face are gone.

Software, monitoring and AI tools are all in place now to surveille and correct en-masse. We are fast approaching a threshold of freedoms that may no longer be as permissive as they currently are.

The key changes greatly affecting our freedom of speech in the future involve the centralization of following elements. Obviously the more that are enacted the stronger the control over society.

The endgame is horrific slavery system that enforces restricted freedoms.

Tooling for Control

• Central Bank Digital Currencies - CBDCs

• AI Government Tooling (Palantir)

• One World Government

• Centralization of Technical Platforms

All control mechanisms are brought in through a sugar coated pill (the promise of something being better) or as a reaction to an existential threat via fear.

Central Bank Digital Currencies will provide full tracking of your every spend. The ability for them to stop you spending on things considered bad (this could be beef, this could be travel). The ability for them to put negative interest rates and for it to cost you to save (no store of value). The ability for them to redistribute wealth based off any whim.

AI Government Tooling such as Palantir effectively casts a net over all digital information including your online chat history, your likes, your friends, your banking, what you read, how you live your day, your travel. Unsupervised machine learning can identify patterns from disparate information and find patterns. This includes statistically relevant predictions of how citizens will behave in the future. Thought crimes and future crimes can be predicted by them. As to what is considered a crime, now that is a moving slider and can be as petty or as heinous as they decide. The issue with AI is that it has infinte scale. Typically if enough people get upset by something, the people outnumber the rulers and can overthrow the rule. With AI, however, there is no scale as to what is controllable. This to me is probably the greatest threat to freedoms.

One World Government - if you have no other alternatives you are living in a monopoly of control. With no other countries to flee too you are subject to one governement, one set of rules. One mob to rule over you.

Centralizaton of Technical Platforms such as communication platforms means that they can control what you say and who is making communications that go against the narrative.

Time

Time is ticking and the slower populations are to assert something is bad, the more likely they are to happen and to bring down society.

Being direct, make statements not ask questions. Be concise in conveying your thoughts.